pros and cons

[Daniel Crone]

Though I have never used k d e and have no idea what it is like, here is my reason I hope accessibility for this desktop gets where it should be.
It is a good idea to have several accessible desktop choices around incase one is no longer workable one day.
Gnome’s settings are hard to work for me.
But to choose a wireless network is not easy in mate.
Each desktop has its own good points.
From anyone who has used k d e, what are its ways it is your desktop of choice?

[Gary Kline]

=====
Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986.
Of_Interest: With Thirty+ years of service to the Unix community.

Post by Daniel Crone
Though I have never used k d e and have no idea what it is like, here is my reason I hope accessibility for this desktop gets where it should be.
It is a good idea to have several accessible desktop choices around incase one is no longer workable one day.
Gnome’s settings are hard to work for me.
But to choose a wireless network is not easy in mate.
Each desktop has its own good points.
From anyone who has used k d e, what are its ways it is your desktop of choice?

no pity, no "I'm So sorry". but it's harder for me to see. so
it's (blah, blah, blah) etc. I used to use kde because my
volunteer system admin liked it best. the gnome icons and using
a script with

echo and some accessibility setup help me to having the computer
read to me. ---i deserve a Swift kick for losing the script.
but that the cost of doing too many things that once.

I'll call it a century there.

1. Gnome
2. kde
3. patching C and othrt scripts together.

---sorry I couldn't be of more help